References are linked throughout this article, noted by underlined/highlighted text. Clicking each link will take you to a new window featuring the specific reference; to return here at any time, simply close the second window.
A Challenging Conundrum
To begin, it is important to understand that minor cramping during menstruation is NORMAL, particularly in younger women and adolescents. Inflammatory hormones like those called “prostaglandins” along with others are linked to menstrual discomfort; mild pain with periods is not typically cause for alarm and may be remedied through a variety of measures. Usually, such pain is temporary and subsides after menses. This is called “dysmenorrhea”. Dysmenorrhea is NOT the same as endometriosis.
The normal endometrium is the lining of the uterus, which breaks down and is shed during menstruation. Normal endometrium is profoundly, histologically different from the ectopic glands and stroma that comprise endometriosis, a disease clinically defined as the presence of tissue – somewhat resembling but not the same as ‘normal’ endometrium – found elsewhere in the body. With endometriosis, this aberrant tissue gives rise to pain, inflammation, development of endometriomas (“chocolate cysts”), fibrosis, and formation of adhesions (fibrous bands of dense tissue).
Endometriosis can affect women and girls of all ages, both menstruators and non-menstruators alike, including before a girl’s first period. The disease has also been documented in the human fetus. Without a doubt: endometriosis has a significant social and psychological impact on the lives of those affected by the disease, across several domains of their lives.
The significant pain and symptoms of endometriosis may worsen or become chronic over time as the lesions become deeper and more fibrotic. As a result, infertility, bladder or bowel dysfunction, painful sex and many other physical and quality of life issues can occur. Current research indicates there is a preponderance of inflammatory milieu and hyperinnervation involved in the pathophysiology of pain in women and girls with the disease, and that patients with chronic pelvic pain routinely demonstrate increased pain sensitivity even in non-pelvic sites. Early data implies that where the lesion is located may correspond to infiltration and/or adhesion formation, though further research will need to be done.
A growing public health and societal crisis carrying a fiscal tag of nearly $119 billion annually, approximately 176 million women and girls worldwide are affected by the disease. Endometriosis also accounts for a significant loss of productivity – nearly 11 hours per woman per week; 38% more than for women with similar symptoms without endometriosis. The illness remains a leading cause of gynecologic hospitalization and hysterectomy (many performed needlessly). Endometriosis is more than so-called “killer cramps“, with symptoms often occurring apart from menses and becoming chronic in nature – far more significant than simple menstrual pain.
In recent years, a small but potential cancer risk in association with the disease has emerged, but it is important to understand that endometriosis is not a malignancy. Though some refer to the disease as a ‘benign cancer,’ it is not, as all cancers by definition are malignant. However, potential does exist for endometriosis to transform into a malignancy, though this is a poorly understood phenomenon.
Generally, no particular demographic, personality trait or ethnic predilection exist in association with endometriosis and there is no preventive measure, though some provocative phenotype studies have begun investigating certain physical characteristics (are women with endometriosis more attractive??) as part of the disease profile. Still, widespread lack of awareness on the part of society at large contributes in part to the average diagnostic delay of nearly a decade (6.7 years) across multiple physician consults—even today.
Common, oft-debilitating symptoms of, and potential associations with, endometriosis include (but are not limited to):
* Crippling menstrual pain
* Pelvic pain at any time, often intractable
* Bowel or urinary disorders/pain/dysfunction
* Painful intercourse/pain with sexual activity
* Infertility/pregnancy loss/possible link to preterm births
* Immune-related disorders
* Allergies, migraines or fatigue that tends to worsen around menses
*The disease may resemble some symptoms of, and has been speculatively linked to, adenomyosis.
Endometriosis typically develops on the pelvic structures including the rectovaginal cul de sac, peritoneum, bladder, bowels, intestines, ovaries and fallopian tubes, but as disease recognition grows, is also increasingly being diagnosed in areas outside the reproductive organs i.e. diaphragm and lungs, where it can induce a dangerous condition called Catamenial Pneumothorax. Rarely, endometriosis may be diagnosed even in areas as far removed from the abdominopelvic region as the brain and soleus/gastrocnemius muscles (though again, this is highly uncommon). Symptoms often start early in life, but may be ignored by caregivers, healthcare consumers and practitioners alike. To wit; an estimated 70% of teens with pelvic pain go on to be later diagnosed with endometriosis.
The only way to obtain a definitive diagnosis of endometriosis is through surgery; typically via Laparoscopy. Though symptoms and/or diagnostic testing (CT scans, MRIs, etc.) may give rise to “informed suspicion,” only surgery permits the requisite visual and more importantly, histological, diagnosis. Laparoscopy also facilitates treatment of the disease. Though a popular approach among some ob/gyn generalists, it is inappropriate – and impossible – to diagnose endometriosis medically.
Staging of disease may done at the time of diagnosis. This is a classification system developed by the ASRM based on the location, extent of and depth of disease, presence and severity of adhesions, and presence and size of endometriomas. Based on the corresponding number of points, endometriosis is assigned into stages I-minimal, II-mild, III-moderate, or IV-severe. Stage does not correlate with severity of symptoms.
Image Copyright (c) American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Often called a “disease of theories”, the definitive cause(s) of endometriosis remain under debate, though demonstrated association with a number of hereditary, environmental, epigenetic and even certain menstrual characteristics exist. Current research has implicated HOX genes, mesenchymal stem cells and certain immunologic factors in disease origin; nonetheless, no single theory explains endometriosis all women; more likely, a composite of several mechanisms is involved.
Retrograde menstruation – ‘Sampson’s Theory’, which dates back to 1921, is perhaps the most popular – yet flawed – of theories. Initially, Dr. John Sampson assumed that endometriosis is the result of “seedlings” from the ovaries. Later, in 1927, he proposed the disease results from reflux menstruation, wherein endometrium is “showered backwards” onto the peritoneum and ovaries, taking hold and implanting. However – endometriosis lesions and endometrium are NOT the same histologically, and retrograde menstruation is a very common phenomenon among most women. Essentially, Sampson’s Theory considers endometriosis as normal endometrial cells which behave abnormally because of abnormal peritoneal milieu; however, this is actually not supported or borne out in the current literature, though this notion has persisted for almost a century. Unfortunately, this popular theory continues to complicate effective management and understanding of the disease today. Despite persistent propagation of Sampson’s Theory, many studies have demonstrated that retrograde menstruation does not account for pathogenesis; the eutopic and ectopic endometrial stromal cells in women with endometriosis exhibit fundamental differences in invasive, adhesive, and proliferative behaviors from those who do not have the disease. Without question, there are various other factors that contribute to disease pathophysiology and pathogenesis.
Immunologic dysfunction – a “broken” immune system may allow for the disease to take hold and play a small role in lesion development – but this does not sufficiently explain the disease process to begin with.
Homeobox genes – dysfunction of HOX genes may results in abnormal differentiation and migration of cells during embryonic formation of the female reproductive tract, giving rise later to endometriosis. The presence of endometriosis in female fetuses strongly suggests an embryologic origin.
Stem Cells – have been linked to disease even in absence of menstruation; this would also account for the rare cases of documented male endometriosis. Work continues to emerge from this area of important research.
Genetics – increased risk of endometriosis may exist in women and girls whose mother or relative has disease.
Environmental Toxicants – pollutants (including a speculative link to dioxins, for which there is insufficient evidence) have been hypothesized to induce certain cell changes, which in turn facilitate abnormal immune response allowing for the disease to take hold.
In specific, very limited cases the cause may be anatomic and/or due to neonatal uterine bleeding, but this remains speculative.
Yet, despite the myriad of theories, no single assumption accounts for all cases in all women. What do we believe? It is likely that women and girls are born with endometriosis and a combined number of pathological factors subsequently trigger the disease.
Recently, a number of blogs have maintained that endometriosis is caused by negative emotions and various deep-seat psychological components. While there are various social, psychological and emotional aspects to any painful, chronic illness such as endometriosis, these are consequences of the disease – not the cause. Endometriosis has its origins in very real, very complex genetic and molecular underpinnings – not some abstract rejection of one’s uterus or inability to get along with one’s parents, for example, as claimed. Various psychoimmune interactions are present in women with endometriosis i.e. pronounced immunological shifts, manifested by imbalanced production of anti-inflammatory cytokines among other biologic responses – but these are part of the network of adaptive reactions associated with and perhaps because of it – not the origin of the disease. Such offensive contention that endometriosis is a psychological ailment due to one’s internal failings or otherwise rooted in emotions leads only to further delayed diagnosis and ineffective treatment of the disease.
Alternative therapies, such as diet and nutrition, acupuncture, physical therapy, and other complementary treatments can be helpful at effectively managing symptoms on a non-invasive basis when combined with quality excisional surgery, which we believe is the cornerstone of any effective management plan.
Dr. Albee and Dr. Sinervo are among the early and few pioneers to focus their work solely on treating endometriosis and pelvic pain pathology. We do not practice obstetrics here at the CEC, and concentrate only on endometriosis and causes of pelvic pain. Our surgeons use the C02 laser to *dissect* the disease, and having been doing so successfully for more than twenty years via a procedure we coined “LAPEX”, or Laparoscopic Excision. LAPEX differs significantly from other, less meticulous laser/other surgical techniques including vaporization and electrocautery, commonly performed by many ObGyns. These methods destroy tissue, making microscopic evaluation impossible and leaving behind endometriosis “roots” – leading to high recurrence.
LAPEX is indeed the gold standard for the definitive treatment of endometriosis, but is unfortunately practiced by only a few accredited, advanced gynecologic-endoscopic surgeons in the world. Our award-winning staff is among the few in the world who are Board Certified and accredited as such. Excision requires highly advanced surgical expertise and commands intense training on the part of the practitioner, as well as a complete and thorough (and accurate) understanding of endometriosis etiology, pathophysiology, sequela and far-reaching consequences.
Confusion often surrounds the surgical approaches for endometriosis. It is important to understand that the laser is a tool, not a method. Laparoscopy is the surgical approach (minimally invasive), not a tool. Hence, the laser can be used to safely and successfully perform laparoscopic resection (excision) of all disease – or it can be used to superficially and incompletely burn the surface. It’s imperative to determine which method your surgeon will be using. Da Vinci is also an approach, not a method. You can learn more about our opinion on the robot and excision here.
At the CEC, our surgeons use the laser as a precision cutting tool, NOT as a means of tissue destruction – vastly different from vaporization and superficial techniques. Endometriosis of the bowel, bladder and beyond can be safely and completely removed with the laser through excision, as can dense adhesions and deep, infiltrating peritoneal disease. All excised tissue is sent to the pathology lab for examination. We also utilize intraoperative adhesion barriers and surgical techniques to minimize formation of secondary (de novo) adhesions. We work with a full surgical team including colorectal, urologic, thoracic and other surgeon colleagues as needed to ensure all endometriosis, from all areas, is thoroughly resected and removed at the time of surgery. Through our LAPEX approach, women and girls of all ages – at all stages of disease – have an excellent chance of being pain-free for the long-term, with minimal chance of persistent symptoms. Our data – dating twenty-five years back across more than 4,500 patients from 43 countries and over 8,000 procedures – shows that in our population, true recurrence is actually quite low when endometriosis is thoroughly and meticulously excised from all locations.
Indeed, although excisional biopsy and resection offers a higher success rate in treating the disease, surgical excision also requires a higher level of surgical skill. As a result, many patients may receive incomplete treatment in their own healthcare setting, which in turn may lead to persistent symptoms and recurrent disease. It should be noted that many women who have undergone repeated surgeries and had a hysterectomy still suffer. You can learn more about this topic here.
The need to improve surgical approach and/or engage in timely referrals is unquestionable; to that end, the CEC has long engaged in a robust campaign of education and surgical fellowships to raise awareness and leave a legacy of improved care for all women and girls with endometriosis (preceptors can click here for more information). Through quality surgery, all disease truly can be removed and debulked; allowing the patient’s own lifestyle interventions (e.g. physical therapy, diet/nutrition, exercise, acupuncture, etc.) to be most effective and ensure maximum outcome. Above all, genuine compassion for those who battle this insidious illness must be present, and this is what we strive for here at the CEC every day.
Unfortunately, many women and girls are often misdiagnosed and/or directed to “manage” the pain for years through repeat, superficial surgeries in which all disease is not removed or use of painkillers and/or medical therapies like oral contraceptives and hormonal injections, but these only mask symptoms and do not treat disease in any way. Patients are also sometimes misled to believe that the only long-term solution is removal of reproductive organs (hysterectomy/salpingo-oophorectomy) – a dangerous myth. Though hysterectomy has its place in endometriosis treatment for select cases, the disease is not “cured” by removal of the uterus, ovaries and/or tubes and cervix. This ongoing misconception is responsible for countless, needless hysterectomies performed each year – indeed, nearly half of the 600,000 hysterectomies performed in the United States annually are the result of endometriosis. Similarly, “pregnancy” and/or “menopause” are often touted as curative, but such claims are equally untrue. Many patients will need complex, multidisciplinary surgery combined with adaptation of lifestyle changes.
The Center for Endometriosis Care (CEC) is a COEMIG-designated Center of Excellence which was formed over two decades ago by Robert B. Albee, Jr., MD and is led by CEC’s Medical Director, Ken R. Sinervo, MD – global pioneers in the precision care and treatment of the disease. Often misdiagnosed and ineffectively treated, the symptoms of disease often chronically persist because it is rarely treated through the advanced, meticulous Laparoscopic Excision (LAPEX) procedure we have been performing here for decades, across thousands and thousands of patients. Such incomplete treatment results from even well-meaning physicians who do not recognize the disease or remove it in its entirety, leaving deep disease – and painful symptoms and pathology – behind. Suppressive medications and hysterectomy are recommended as next-step ‘cures’ – which of course they are not. We believe the key to success is removing disease, not organs. True disease recurrence is actually quite low if all endometriosis is thoroughly excised from all locations – including the bowel, bladder and beyond.
Only through early intervention can we reduce the associated morbidity, infertility and progressive symptoms of endometriosis. We must “alleviate our culture of menstrual misinformation” for our daughters through timely and authoritative disease education – thus leading to reduced costs and most importantly, improved patient outcome. Early diagnosis and proper treatment are critical keys to living well in spite of the disease. Please let us know how we can help you.